We’ve raised a US$2M pre-seed round

Read announcement
Free tool · no sign-up required

AI Search Revenue at Risk Calculator

Four inputs. One number. See how much annual revenue your brand could lose as ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity, and Gemini answer queries your customers used to search.

Your inputs

Four numbers. That is all.

10,000

Total monthly organic sessions across your site — the same number GA4 shows under Organic Search.

0%

How much of your organic volume is absorbed by AI answers this year. 30–45% is the planning range most enterprise teams use; 40% is a reasonable midpoint.

0%

Session-to-customer rate. SaaS typically lands near 2%. Long-cycle enterprise B2B often sits between 0.3–0.8%.

$12,000

Annual contract value for SaaS or average order value for commerce. Use LTV if CAC payback is multi-year.

Annual revenue at risk

If you do nothing

$0

per year, across the next 12 months

Traffic lost to AI search (annual)0
Customers lost0
Revenue lost per month$0
Share your result

Copy the live calculator link with your inputs pre-filled.

The math

How the calculator works

Annual Revenue at Risk = Monthly Organic Traffic × AI-Search Decline Rate × Conversion Rate × Deal Size × 12

Why 40% is the default decline

Public reporting from HubSpot in 2026 showed roughly 58% organic decline on queries that now trigger a Google AI Overview. Across a blended portfolio of AI and non-AI queries, 30–45% is the planning band most enterprise teams work with. We default to a conservative midpoint.

Why conversion rates stay as-is

When a brand is indexed in the model, AI-referred traffic tends to convert at rates similar to classical organic. The shrinkage is on the volume side, not intent. Hold conversion steady and let the traffic input carry the shock.

What is NOT modeled

Brand and navigational search is more durable than informational queries. Direct traffic absorbs some of the loss. Paid media can backfill, though at rising CPCs. This calculator models the gross exposure, not the net figure after substitution.

Why this is a planning tool

Treat the output as a ceiling of exposure, not a forecast. Use it to size the problem and justify an investment. For the actual forecast you need share-of-model measurement, citation-frequency baselines, and roughly sixty days of observation.

FAQ

Questions leaders ask about this number

It's a planning ceiling, not a forecast. The number shows the gross exposure to AI-search compression if you do nothing to adapt. Use it to size the problem and justify the investment decision — then measure actuals with share-of-model and citation tracking once work begins.

If the number is big enough to matter, the next step is a 30-minute conversation

Walk through your inputs with our team and leave with a concrete AEO roadmap for the next two quarters.

Browse all free tools